Home Blog Page 189

Upsets and Surprises in Parliamentary Election Results

0

Turning the attention from the presidential election results, many big heads have rolled in the parliamentary elections for both the ruling NRM and the opposition parties.

The biggest names so far in the NRM is the minister and state minister the ICT ministry. Minister Aggrey Awori has lost as well as his state minister, Alintuma Nsambu. Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Isaac Musumba has also lost. Minister for Gender Gabriel Opio, whose ministry brought about the controversial Cultural Leaders’ Bill, has lost as well as Minister for Internal Affairs Kirunda Kivejinja. The Minister for the Presidency Dorothy Hyuha has lost to the young and vibrant Serena Nebanda.

Minister of Education Namirembe Bitamazire has lost as well as Minister Beatrice Wabudeya.

On the side of the opposition, the leader of the opposition in parliament Prof. Ogenga Latigo has lost. Susan Nampijja who stood in Makindye West leaving room for her father Ken Lukyamuzi to stand in Rubaga South, has lost. However, Lukyamuzi has triumphed in Rubaga South.

The biggest surprise in Kampala has come from Rubaga North where the little-known Moses Kasibante has trounced the NRM flag-bearer Katongole Singh. Most commentators were of the view that this constituency was a done deal for Katongole, but it has turned out otherwise.

On the other hand, Amelia Kyambadde has won in Mawokota North defeating her fellow NRM stalwart Clavier Mutuluuza. This was a hotly contested constituency whereby some sections of State House were supporting Mutuluuza who stood as an independent after losing the NRM primaries to Kyambadde, the former Principal Presidential Secretary to President Museveni.

FDC spokesman Wafula Oguttu and FDC Finance Secretary Jack Sabiiti have both made it to parliament. The former Mengo ministers Matthias Mpuuga and Medard Ssegona have also won in their respective constituencies.

Opposition Alleges Massive Rigging

0

For the third time, incumbent Yoweri Museveni’s main rival, Dr. Kizze Besigye, has alleged massive rigging during the presidential elections that occurred on Friday.

Besigye, who during the campaigns had threatened to call mass protests if the election is rigged, alluded to “people power” like in Tunisia and Egypt as the only option left to end what he termed as Museveni dictatorial rule.

Provision results announced by the Electoral Commission (EC) at 4.30pm showed Museveni leading with 2.9 million votes. Besigye was a trailing behind him with 900,000 votes. Full results are expected late to night.

Besigye said there was massive rigging through vote-buying, stuffing of ballot boxes with pre-ticked ballots, intimidation of voters and opposition polling agents were forced out of polling stations.

“What we’ve seen is not credible. It’s now clear the will of the people can’t be expressed through an election in this corrupt system,” he said. “The people are sovereign. They have the ultimate power.”

Besigye who vied on the Inter-Party Cooperation ticket, a coalition of four parties that came together to field as their presidential candidates, joined Olara Otuunu, another presidential candidate who earlier in the day described the election as “a sham” and rejected the result.

He cited the deployment of hundreds of soldiers and police into streets as a deliberate effort to instil fear and intimidate voters.

“Everyone with ears will have heard the jet fighters and military helicopters hovering overhead. Local council officials and security agents have been threatening people with war if Museveni does not win this election,” Besigye said at a press conference at the Forum for Democratic Change party offices.

He said polling stations opened late in opposition strongholds, including Kampala, saying “it happened in such a widespread fashion in order to suppress voter turn out where the opposition stood to win.”

Besigye said he is set to meet officials of the coalition (IPC) tomorrow (Sunday) morning, where the next course of action will be decided; adding he will not go to court since the judiciary “is a victim of the same corrupt and repressive environment.”

Uganda opposition started protesting even before the election for Uganda’s presidential poll was announced, describing the exercising in which incumbent Yoweri Museveni is seeking to extend his 25 year rule to 30 years as a sham.

Otuunu, who described the election as a sham and rejected it results, said the country was ripe for Tunisia and Egyptian-like protests that ousted Presidents Ben Ali and Hosin Barrack respectively.

“The election was a sham with absolutely no meaning. Like we have said before, it was not free and fair characterized by fraud and malpractices” Dr Otuunu told a news conference a day after polling on Saturday.

“It is up to Ugandans to chose whether they will submit to Museveni’s subjugation and political slavery in which the country is governed to his term or not and rise up to be governed to their terms. Under natural law and the constitution Ugandans will be exercising their rights to protest like it was in Tunisia and Egypt,” said Otuunu.

On the eve of the polls, President Museveni warned Ugandans not to engage in any acts of demonstration saying “the Tunisia and Egypt like popular protests can’t happen in Uganda.”

Asked what will done if it happened, Museveni told journalists that “we will round them up and lock them up in the most humane way.”

Hundreds of soldiers and police officers have been deployed in Kampala, where they are conducting patrols day and night. Key opposition figures have said the soldiers were intimidating voters.

There were some reported incidences of violence and rigging during yesterday’s elections. The Red Cross said two people were killed and dozens others injured as rival groups clashed, but police denied knowledge of the incidents.

Army spokesman, Lieutenant Colonel Felix Kulayigye said police had requested help to keep the peace. However, soldiers did not go near polling centres.

“As you know, there’s the threat of terrorism. And when night comes, you can’t know what can happen,” he told reporters.

Sorry, But You Are Not on the Register

0

Countless people showed up to vote on election day only to be turned away for not being on the register. For our reporter, his quest to vote fast turned into a long and fruitless search for his name.

It was a clear morning on election day and I lined up at my respective polling station to cast my vote. As I waited for my turn, I felt both excited and anxious. It was that nervous feeling that something bad was going to happen today. But at that moment I did not know that this ‘bad’ thing was going to happen to me.

My polling station was at the Faith Trust Primary School, Kawotto in Kajjansi. At the time there were less than 50 people queuing to vote. This is the same polling station I voted from in 2006. I approach the table where officials are checking the register and handed them my voters card. After ten minutes I was told by the officials that I am not on their register.

“Please try the next polling station at Kitende Church of Uganda,” was the advice from one lady at the checking bench. How could it be that despite the fact that I have a voters’ card issued on January 3, 2006 I am not on the voters’ register?

The next polling station I was referred to is about a kilometre from Faith Trust. I walked there and after queuing for ten minutes I was told that my name was not on their register either. “Try thenext station along Entebbe road,” I was further advised.

My experience was not any different from many other registered voters in various parts of the country who could not cast their vote on election day. Clovice Nyakatura from Makindye Division had a similar story to tell after visiting two polling stations without finding his name on any of the registers.

“I went to the first polling station at the Gombolala where I was directed by a police officer to join the line where my name was meant to be listed. But after lining for 20 minutes I was told my name was not there,” said Nyakatura.

Nyakatura was advised to check with the Electoral Commission official that was handling the complaints. The official had left the station and was due to return after midday, it was now 9am.

Nyakatura jumped on a boda boda to the next station which was about a kilometre away but found his name missing again from the register. He lost patience and gave up participating in the vote. One possible reason for his name missing from the register is that he transferred from Kabale to Makindye- Madirissa zone but Nyakatura insisted he filled out the proper paperwork. Leyah, another voter from Mukono who preferred to give only her first name also found her name missing from the voters’ register. She had transferred her name at the EC from her last polling station in Bugolobi a year before.

“I showed up that morning and I was told that I was not on the register. I was told to try another station but my name was not there either. There were a lot of people like me who could not vote that day,” said Leyah.

At Seeta Church of Uganda, an estimated 200 people gathered outside the polling station after finding their names not on the register. It took the intervention of the police to calm down the group. Many in the group suspected they were intentionally disenfranchised since Seeta is a well-known opposition area.

While there is no official record yet from the public or the Electoral Commission about the disenfranchised voters, there are numerous complaints of individuals missing voting all around the country.

Prior to the election, I received an SMS from my telecom stating that I could “confirm your polling station for the upcoming election. Send your voter ID number or 17 digit handwritten number on your voter receipt to 8683 for free.”

I followed the instructions sending my registration number and got this reply: “Status: NOT VERIFIED. This number does not exist in the Voters’ Register! Please make sure you sent EC your correct voters’ number. If it was correct, please TYPE (Surname) SPACE (First Name) SPACE (Date of Birth) and SEND TO 8683 From: 8683”

Following this advice, I sent my name and date of birth as required but got this reply: “Your name does not appear in the voter’s register. This means that you did not register or you have not updated your information on the register. Please contact the Electoral Commission for further assistance. Good Luck. Uganda still needs you. From: 8683

From the National Voters’ Register Online, Sorry! The Voter ID entered seems not to exist in the system.” The following day I called the Electoral Commission and was advised to go and check with the data section which I did, getting a verbal confirmation from one of the staff that my name was indeed on the register. When I insisted on knowing the polling station she advised me to go to where I collected my voter’s card from.

With that assurance, I went to the polling station to cast my votes but it only turned into a walking and boda boda riding session as I travelled from one station to another in search of my name. I went to Water Polling Station Kitende, then Sissa Gombolola polling station, from where I proceeded to Muwana Polling station which is about four kilometers away from the previous two.

It was now past midday and I was still looking for my name and I could not find it anywhere. I gave it another shot at Uganda Clays and Kajjansi Dispensary with no positive result. I had already spent around 15,000 shillings on boda boda fares and could not afford to lose any more so I gave up my quest to vote.

Nakitende Jackie, is another voter’s card holder that missed voting. She checked three polling stations without any luck of finding her name before also giving up.

While this is the experience of a few we have talked to, there are many more out there who had a similar experience but have nowhere to voice their complaint. Some politicians expressed their fear to the Electoral Commission ahead of the polling day.

“I am writing to express my disappointment at the way you have handled my correspondences to your office and to report gross violation of electoral laws, to which you are aloof. It is now five hours into the polling day and despite an earlier correspondence of mine to your office, in which I sought explanation on the omission of the polling stations in Misindye Parish and Seeta Ward on the packing list, you have not responded.

Many of my supporters have been turned away from polling stations because their names don’t feature in the registers even when the Electoral Commission’s SMS system states that they fall under the polling stations in question.

It has also been discovered that in some registers, names in other alphabetical arrangements fall under N-Z. Such a mix up to me is a deliberate move to compromise the electoral process especially as the register is a vital document in the exercise,” read part of a letter addressed to the Electoral Commission by Betty

Nambooze MP for Mukono North (at the time contesting Mukono Municipality Parliamentary seat.)

Electoral Commission Publicist Paul Bukenya told the Kampala Dispatch that it was not disfranchisement but technical removal of double or multiple entries on the register which led to the problems, especially for those that transferred polling stations.

“The Commission gave everybody who was eligible to vote the opportunity to register and thereafter displayed the voter’s register for people to confirm including the electronic mechanisms we employed. The commission is satisfied that we did our best to enable eligible Ugandans to vote,” said Bukenya.

Bukenya said there are cases of people that registered twice and were removed from one area. He guessed that these people probably turned up in one area yet they are on the register elsewhere.

“We had a complaint desk in every area and there were cases that could be solved immediately and those that were deferred. What happened is that for those that transferred civic areas and did not fill transfer forms, their names were retained at the original place of registration,” Bekenya explained.

He said another problem was the reluctance by some people to check their status during the times when the Electoral Commission displayed the registers.

“We gave a chance to all to check with the registers between May and June last year, some people did and others did not. After that time we then compiled the final register which we displayed in the villages for 21 days,” explained Bukenya.

However, on close examination from the Data Centre at the Electoral Commission there is a possibility that some people could have been issued more than one voter’s card. For my case, I learned from the Data Centre that another card was issued in my names and details as per my first registration in Kansanga Our Lady of Mount Camry Polling station in Kampala District.

Hypothetically despite my transfer from Kampala District in 2005, my name has remained at the Kansanga Our Lady of Mount Camry in Makindye where the first card was issued.

The Electoral Commission staff in the data centre explained that this happened due to failure by the officials at the polling station to offer transfer forms to people in the transfer category to fill in.

“Please come back after April 7th when the elections are over then we can effect the transfer and issue you with a new card,” came the advice from a staff from the data centre.

I guess I will use the next few years to make sure that my voting credentials are in order. It was disheartening not to vote this year having voted in each election since 1996. But in 2016 I will be ready and properly credentialed. I hope.

Uganda Elections 2011: The Presidential Candidates – Early Predictions

0

The absence of arrests of opposition leaders, interrupting of opposition rallies and confrontations of mostly opposition supporters with police has surprised, as it has pleased, many.

After what has been described as the most peaceful campaigns that started in November 2010, many Ugandans are cautiously awaiting the polls and results of the country’s second multiparty election that begins on Friday February 18th with the 2011 Presidential and parliamentary polls. It is not that the first multiparty elections in 2006 were very violent. The absence of arrests of opposition leaders, interrupting of opposition rallies and confrontations of mostly opposition supporters with police has surprised, as it has pleased, many.

Like in 2006 and before, while Ugandans will be voting for President and members of Parliament on Friday, District leaders on February 23rd and lower local council leaders early March, it is the results of the presidential poll that is most eagerly awaited.

The 2011 Uganda elections have attracted a record 8 Presidential candidates from seven political parties and one Independent candidate. All the Presidential Candidates have been on the campaign trail marketing their manifestos to Ugandans and have dispelled earlier assertions that some of them, seen as weak, will pull out of the campaigns that like in 2006 were expected to majorly be between incumbent Yoweri Museveni of the National Resistance Movement and Dr. Kizza Besigye of the Forum for Democratic Change. Below we profile the candidates based on their manifesto promises, impact in campaigns and their political fortunes come voting day on Friday 18th February 2011.

The 2011 Presidential Candidates:

  • Samuel Walter Mukaaku Lubega
  • Beti Olive Kamya Namisango Turwomwe
  • Nobert Mao
  • Dr. Kizza Besigye Warren Kifefe
  • Yoweri Kaguta Museveni
  • Dr. Abed Bwanika
  • Olara Otunu
  • Jabel Bidandi Ssali

Samuel Walter Mukaaku Lubega

Samuel Walter Mukaaku Lubega

(Back to top)

Samuel Walter Mukaaku Lubega, 43, who describes himself as “an ardent federalist and unshakable member of the Democratic Party”, stood as an Independent after losing the DP Presidential flag bearer battle to Nobert Mao. Lubega surprised many by raising the required 1,000 signatures from at least one third of Uganda’s 112 districts to get nominated for the presidential race. But that has been as much as we have heard Lubega in the campaigns as he held few rallies and had very few posters that even many people in the Kampala are still wondering who this 8th Presidential candidate is.

But Lubega who has been promising to grant federalism and attract more development support to improve social services defended his scant presence saying he had a different strategy of campaigning house to house. But with each Presidential candidate allocated one day to campaign in each district, such a strategy, if it was real, did little to show a serious side of Lubega that many Ugandans would have hoped for. It must be sad for even his most ardent supporter that few people knew his campaign slogan of “Be part of the change Uganda can trust”- a slogan that could have probably attracted support if well marketed. One can comfortably say thanks for trying, but Mr. Lubega is a pure outsider in the race and will surely come last.

Beti Olive Kamya Namisango Turwomwe

Beti Olive Kamya Namisango Turwomwe

Back to top

Unlike Lubega, Beti Olive Kamya Namisango Turwomwe has used all the things that make her a unique candidate to convince many Ugandans (including those that will not vote for her) that she is serious. Kamya who is the flag bearer of the Uganda Federal Alliance has vigorously marketed her move to change the country from a unitary system of government that she says concentrates all resources at the center and introduce a federal system of governance that she says will enable equitable development as regions maintain most of their resources and allocate them as they best deem fit.

Beti Olive Kamya Namisango Turwomwe

She has also been keen to remind people she is the only female Presidential candidate in the race, and promising to deliver motherly leadership that is equitable and not exploitative. She has even rubbed in the fact that she is a widow and promised widows, especially in northern Uganda where a 20 years plus war took many men, that she will have programs and policies that benefit widows, orphans and the most vulnerable.

No one doubted her marketing skills as she had already done well in marketing reform Agenda, Forum for Democratic Change (from where she defected to form her own party), and earlier marketing experience at Uganda Wildlife Education center where she was Executive Director (1999-2004) and Marketing manager at Uganda Breweries before that. But her acrimonious fall out with the FDC after she failed to get elected party Chairperson, and the fact that she is running what some call a “one issue campaign” (federalism) must have dented her presidential bid.

Even sickness had its toll on her, as she was literally picked from presidential campaigns to Kampala International Hospital where she was operated before she returned to the campaign trail. Whatever the results of the presidential elections, many will keep admiring her courage to bid for the top office, going through the campaigns and aspiring to be a president with less power as her federalism promise would give distinct authority for states to self govern on agreed upon areas. For those supporting her, few of them even remember that Kamya, the Rubaga North MP is among the 70 MPs who lost their seats due to changing political party affiliation following a constitutional court ruling. This is a middle candidate. Impressive but not a big impact. Will come or 4th.

Nobert Mao

Nobert Mao

Back to top

The other Presidential candidate that has held his own on the first bid to become CEO of Uganda is DP’s Nobert Mao, fondly called the Obama of Uganda by his supporters. Mao, 43, is the youngest of the eight contenders for Uganda President and has been using this to his advantage asking the majority youth to vote for a leader “born after Uganda’s 1962 independence” in order to bring about change in governance.

He has also used the fact that his mother is a Munyankole from south western Uganda and his father an Acholi as one factor that makes him an ideal candidate to bring unity and harmony in a country Mao says has been fracture by sectarianism and divide-and-rule politics. He also says he has a high chance of getting the northern Uganda vote, which has traditionally supported the opposition. With a good track record as a political leader while Gulu Member of Parliament and Gulu district LC5 Chairman, Mao has credible testimonials of his abilities at public affairs management. But the failure to unite his fractured DP with some members of the party like Mukono North MP Betty Nambooze and Kapala Central MP Elias Lukwago openly campaigning for Forum for Democratic Change Candidate Dr. Kizza Besigye, it might be hard to gain enough trust that he can unite the country if he cannot unite one party.

Though Mao believes he will be second to Museveni, that chance is highly unlikely but it is agreeable he already performed well to be among the four leading contenders. Our prediction is that best Mao can do is to come 3rd.

Dr. Kizza Besigye Warren Kifefe

Dr. Kizza Besigye Warren Kifefe

Back to top

FDC’s Dr. Kizza Besigye Warren Kifefe who is also representing the Interparty Coalition has once again enjoyed widespread crowd support throughout his campaigns on his 3rd at the top office. The retired colonel has led a spirited campaign for “Change is coming” and has almost been swearing how he is defeating President Museveni this time round. Besigye who has claimed he lost the previous elections in 2006 and 2011 due to rigging by the NRM says his party has invested in ensuring no one rigs. But despite his good promises of more accountable leadership and better service delivery, many still view him as a Museveni competitor than an alternative politician.

Besigye, a bush war veteran and former personal doctor of President Museveni, parted ways with his former ally after what he called irreversible digression by the NRM of the 10 point programme that they had set out to accomplish for the country. He sure has done a lot to show the ills of the government, but with no one arresting him or connecting him to court cases as they did in 2006 campaigns where he was facing treason and rape charges that were both quashed by Court much later, it is not clear whether he has won more support presenting issues than he did as a victim of the current government in past elections. Besigye, a no doubt credible contender, is facing the most challenging candidature of his career as he must prove that he is more than just a serial contender. As in the past two elections, Besigye is coming out of the campaigns with the best opposition chance as victory, but there is no evidence he has done better than NRM’s Museveni. The 2nd position might be his best and worst.

Yoweri Kaguta Museveni

Yoweri Kaguta Museveni

Back to top

NRM’s flag bearer Yoweri Kaguta Museveni has continued to be overbearing and even without the controversial opinion polls that have given him a 64-65% victory, it has been clear that he is the man to beat. Not just that he an incumbent and enjoys advantages of being the reigning president, but Museveni has over his 25 year rule made several achievements that many people want him to continue. While there is no doubt about his autocratic and domineering tendencies, the man is a darling to many that work with him, and many people in the countryside will insist he is the only capable man. Of course he is the only one that has had a chance at the presidency for the past 25 years. He is promising more prosperity and transforming the country from 3rd world. If his reduction on donor aid to 30% in the past term is anything to go by, many must have been convinced he can do even better especially with Uganda set to start oil production during the next two years. Even with impressive economic figures though, many Ugandans still live in poverty while his government has maintained Uganda a comfortable seat in the most corrupt countries in the world.

Like other leaders who have stayed long in power, instances of nepotism, big administration expenditures, abuse of state resources are key issues cited against Museveni. But the man his supporters have given all kinds of names has survived all nature of criticisms to maintain a commendable global and local reputation as a trusted and serious leader, a key point he has tried to emphasize during the 2011 campaigns where he says him and his party are the only one’s with a vision and capable of leading Uganda to prosperity. The polls will decide how many agree with him. Even if you don’t agree with his supporters who are already celebrating victory with a Kiwede (“its finished” or “we have already won”) concert, the man seems set to give Ugandans another rap for five years. However much it pains some people, Museveni is still the favourite to win the elections when Electoral Commission Chairman Dr. Badru Kiggundu announces the results on February 20th.

Dr. Abed Bwanika

Dr. Abed Bwanika

Back to top

Dr. Abed Bwanika the President of the People’s Development party is making his second try at becoming Uganda President, and truth be told, the 2011 campaigns have shown that promising and idea-driven Bwanika that enchanted many in 2006. Bwanika has appeared in the press more, while threatening to quit the race for police harassment, that his manifesto which most independents will agree is the best. Bwanika’s promises of creating more jobs, re-invigorating the agriculture sector and streamlining public expenditure among others continue to excite many issues-conscious Ugandans. But he has little political weight as his party is not known for much political activity or influential individuals as do say NRM, FDC or DP. He will do well by coming 5th.

Olara Otunu

Olara Otunu

Back to top

Uganda People’s Congress flag bearer Ambassador Olara Otunu while making his first bid at becoming Uganda President is the only one, other than Museveni representing a party, that has ever ruled Uganda. He therefore has a big basis on which to ask Ugandans to be trusted as he has what to show people his government can do. He says UPC has a better plan for Uganda from infrastructure to service delivery and business. The former UN Under Secretary for Children however leads a much leaner party than his predecessors, and it is not clear if he has worked enough to garner more support for his party or himself, having been out of the country for most of his adult life. Despite his impressive credentials, Otunu’s campaign has been a shadow of the real contenders, and he will likely come 6th.

Jabel Bidandi Ssali

Back to top

Jabel Bidandi Ssali of the People’s Progressive Party is a veteran politician who broke away from NRM to form his own party after opposing President Museveni’s bid to change the constitution by lifting the two term limit so he one can run for Uganda President for as many times. Bidandi says he is the best candidate because of his advanced age and trust he says he enjoys amongst all political camps. He says he can end what he calls current divisive policies so the country can heal and focus on development. He is promising better leadership and accountability. He has had a rather limited impact on the campaign trail with the major positive being he has no single enemy. But that hardly wins you votes, and in Bidandi’s case, not even your son’s vote, as Bebe Cool, one of his sons has publicly declared he supports NRM’s Museveni. While that might be taken as a simple issue especially given that Bebe Cool got help from Museveni for his treatment abroad, there is no Bidandi factor to talk of in the current politics. But probably there is and the results of the polls to be announced by 6pm Sunday will do the final judgment. As for us, it hurts to say Mzee Bidandi will come 7th or there about.

Note should be taken that the positions to the candidates are predictions and the real performance of the different presidential candidates will be announced by Dr. Kiggundu on Sunday.

Museveni is Weak to Defeat Me – Besigye

0
Besigye Campaigns

The Inter-Party Cooperation presidential flag bearer has told the people of Ankole not to get frightened that President Museveni would arrest him, saying “he knows how to fight for himself.”

Dr Kizza Besigye, who is currently campaigning in the western region, attempted to allay fears by residents that Mr Museveni would arrest him before the February 18 presidential elections. He asked residents to work hard and change the current political system which he says has “compounded majority of them into economic slavery.” “This Besigye you see before you here knows how to fight for himself,” he said, adding: “Even if Museveni takes me to Luzira, I will come out. If he sprays teargas on me, I will walk through it, and I can even go into exile today and come back tomorrow. This Besigye cannot be knocked down easily.”

Dr Besigye’s possible arrest is linked to remarks he alledgedly made last year while touring Lango, to the effect that the government had leased off Lake Kyoga, Lake Victoria and other lakes to undisclosed foreign investors. This was after complaints from local fishermen that they were being barred from using the lake by unknown foreigners.

While describing himself as a fighter who cannot be easily intimidated, Dr Besigye said whoever attempts to arrest him or mess up the electoral process would be creating his short cut to the International Criminal Court. “The reason you have not seen the Kiboko squad is because they are running scared of the ICC. The ICC officials are here to record everything that is happening. I think you heard of what happened in Kenya. He (Museveni) can be taken to the ICC like his Kenyan counterparts.”

Uganda’s eastern neighbour, Kenya, slipped into an orgy of tribal violance which left more than 1,500 people dead and thousands displaced following the disputed 2007 election.

The FDC leader challenged President Museveni to first arrest his son-in-law Odrek Rwabwogo who he claims has become “synonymous with corruption”. “As I speak today, there is a report in Parliament which pins government officers of swindling Shs500b meant for Chogm (the Commonwealth Heads of Government State Meeting),” Dr Besigye said. “Instead of arresting these officers, Mr Museveni is threatening to arrest Besigye for saying that government sold the lake. Why can’t he arrest his son-in-law who took Shs240m to make Chogm adverts but could not produce even a single receipt?”

Over 20 LDP Youths Cross to UFA

0

OVER 20 Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) youth brigade leaders of Mayor Nasser Ssebaggala yesterday crossedto the Uganda Federal Alliance (UFA). The youth said they represented about 10,000 people. They were received by the UFA leader, Beti Kamya, at Nakivubo stadium.

The youth were members of the Liberal Democratic Party which Ssebaggala formed after falling out with DP. Led by Mbuga Semeyi and Eng Katumba Muzamiru, the youth said they did not agree with Sebaggala’s desertion of the party for the NRM. “We suffered a lot under the NRM leadership and we hate it because it stopped the Kabaka, Ronald Mutebi, from visiting Kayunga district last year,” Muzamiru said. They also cited neglect and hopelessness in the DP which they said was experiencing divisions that had torn it apart.

Kamya, while addressing the press at Jovan Hotel in Bakuli- Mengo after receiving another group of defectors, said they would add votes to the Uganda Federal Alliance. Frank Matovu, formerly the DP vice-chairperson for Lubaga North, coordinated the defections. “These youth have skills of guard against vote rigging, they will also add numbers to the voters of UFA and will boost our strength in Buganda,” said Kamya. She added that defectors were welcome since it meant that the message for the need of federalism over unitary government was being heeded. She added that the federal youth brigade would not guarantee total protection of UFA votes but would boost their mechanisms of protecting their votes.

Others who defected were John Francis Katende, Cyrus Lukwago, Samuel Mujuzi, Mugerwa Kidugaro, and Catherine Rwatangabo.

Betty Kamya Puts Voters on Task

0

Uganda Federal Alliance (UFA) presidential candidate Beti Kamya has asked voters to prove that they [Kamya during campaigns in Kyotera ] agitated for a Federal system of governament as indicated in the Benjamin Odoki and Professor Fredrick Sempebwa’s reports. Kamya said whereas the two reports showed that most Ugandans wanted ‘federo’, it was never taken seriously.

“We want to put it on record that a given percentage of Ugandans want the federal system of government. As the Uganda Federal Alliance we have set the ball rolling and it is now upon you to prove that the two reports were true,” Kamya said. She was addressing residents of Kalisizo, Nakatoogo and Kyotera at her campaign in Rakai district. Kamya said although she was competing with seven men, she was sure to emerge winner because she stood for a given cause of fronting federalism. She explained that since 1966, Ugandans and Buganda in particular have been crying for federo and voted for whoever promised to deliver it.

She added that at the beginning there was no arrangement to identify pro-federo voters, but this time UFA had solved that problem. “I believe women are more responsible when it comes to looking after children, welcoming guests and maintaining a home. Based on this background, I expect all votes to be cast in favour of Uganda Federal Alliance which is represented by the only woman in the race,” she added. She related federalism to a man who wanted to start a home with a wife. “If you want to start a home, you go out and look for a woman, the same procedure should be followed when we are looking forward to a federal state,” she said. Kamya said it would be a shame for people who chant federalism over the radio, in political rallies and other foras to vote for something else in the coming election.

Bebe Cool in Boston: The Show of the Year

0

It was the show of the year! Bebe Cool’s show at the French Club last Saturday was definitely a success.  The turn-out was strong, and the fans had nearly three hours of fun with the artist, unlike other shows we’ve had with musicians back home.  The organizer of the show, Ms. Hawah Ssebunya, gets an A+ for organizing such a wonderful show.  The M.C., Charles Muwavala, also gets high marks, from the smoothness of the event to the clear sound.

The Ugandan community in Boston loves Bebe Cool.

The evening began with Touch and Soul, a band from Boston headed by the son of the late Elly Wamala.  The DJ was largely excellent until the eleventh hour, when he made some strange comments that left fans puzzled.

But at exactly 11:05, the MC introduced Bebe Cool to the stage, and the crowd screamed.  Many people could not believe that he could walk and dance on his feet after the shootings earlier this year.

Bebe Cool thanked and praised the Touch and Soul band for their performance that night, and vowed that he would use the band every time he returns to Boston.  He also advised all musicians to support the band– and the crowd gave this large applause.

During the second part of the show,  DJ Jamo (also known as DJ Kasenge) played tune after tune, and the crowd kept screaming.  Everytime he stopped, the crowd would shout, then scream again when he would start playing.  It was really fun!

During the show, Bebe introduced his mother and wife Zuena, who had been seated in the back.  Before Zuena came on the stage, Bebe introduced his mother, and sung a number he composed for her.  Bebe said he missed her a great deal.  His mother could not stop tears of joy from rolling down her cheeks.  Then Zuena showed up at the stage, delighting the audience.

Men in the crowd began cheering “kale omusajja alina embooko,” literally meaning that Bebe has a beautiful wife.  Zuena thanked the people of Boston for welcoming them, and supporting her husband.  Finally, the Kasepiki song came on, and the crowd went crazy.  Zuena stood behind her husband as he blew the Kasepiki.  He sang the song twice, as fans called for more.

By12:45 am, almost everything ended as planned.  Then we had another show from DJ Jamo, who began by  thanking everyone who turned up that evening.  As a Luganda saying goes, “ku mbaga tekubula musiwuufu.”  After the DJ thanked everyone, he started yelling in the microphone at someone who wrote an article about an earlier Chameleone  show in Boston.

People couldnt believe that such words were coming from the DJ, who had had a nice night.  At some point, he even threatened to expose this writer that was in the crowd.  He even went on to compare his wedding with the person who had written that article, boasting that DJ Jamo had a more fantastic wedding than him.  DJ Jamo went on to warn that no writer that he can put him or her in, meaning that he has the power to put the reporter behind bars in Uganda .

At this time, a drunk man began yelling in Luganda, “leka baba wandikeko tukoye okutubba.” This means that they should write about you; we are tired of being cheated.  Then ladies began joking with chants of “bali tebamanyi nti nabasajja balina wolokoso,” or that they didn’t know that men also gossip.

Many people were puzzled as the DJ asked whether he should expose this guy, to which he got no answer.  The DJ’s show ended up being about seven minutes long.  It finally ended when one intoxicated woman yelled back at the DJ, and told him to keep quiet about those writing about him.  She added that he should be happy that people knew him, and which newspaper had ever composed a story about him,  apart from imposters.

As the DJ ended his speech, he promised the crowd to expose the journalist who covered the Chameleone performance.  But up to now, people are still trying to figure out what inspired the Dj to give such an uncalled speech. At 1 a.m., it was time to go home.

Despite entertainers threatening to take reporters out for unfavorable reviews, it was really a great night.  We haven’t seen anything like this in Boston this year! The fans just wanted more music.

And keep an eye on this page– you shouldn’t miss out if the DJ decides to expose the writer!

Geoffrey Nsereko is a Ugandan-American radio presenter based in Boston, Massachusetts.  He hosts a radio show on http://www.radiougandaboston.com/about.htm.  It is called “Gyetuva ne Gyetulaga,” and airs on Wednesday from 5:00 pm EST and Sunday from 6:00 pm.  You can listen through the Radio Uganda Boston website here.

Impact of Oil Development on Wildlife Not Always Obvious

0

Nobody really knows what effect oil drilling will have on wildlife in Uganda.  Most of the national parks and other protected areas are slated for drilling, and much of the oil is being found in the Albertine Rift, one of the most biodiverse regions on the planet.  In Murchison Falls National Park, most of the current and proposed test wells are in the areas with the highest concentrations of wildlife and, while efforts are being made to gather some baseline data on the animals to measure impacts against, population numbers are estimates at best, and behavioral studies of the animals are limited or non-existent.  If the natural heritage of this country is going to be protected, a lot more information needs to be gathered.

One thing that Uganda can do is look to studies that have been done in other places that are farther along the oil journey.  Gabon is another country that is drilling in its national parks, and it has many of the same species of animals.  A study was published this year in the journal Biological Conservation that looks at Oil Prospecting and its Impact on Large Rainforest Mammals in Loango National Park, Gabon. The species they looked at are elephants, gorillas, chimpanzees, monkeys and duikers – all species that can be found in Uganda as well.

The researchers were specifically looking at the effects of noise disturbance from seismic testing in an 80 sq. km. study area.  The method of seismic testing used by the oil companies involved setting dynamite charges below ground at 50 meter intervals along transects through the area.   According to the report, “The sound level pressure of this type of seismic oil explorations reaches usually up to 210dB next to the explosion site.  This is about 10,000 times louder than a jet aircraft flying by at 300 m altitude.”  Yikes.

Learning a Lesson from Oil Development in Gabon

A rainforest is very different from a savanna, and the potential impacts of oil development go far beyond the noise created by seismic testing.  However, there are aspects of this study that I believe are important to keep in mind as Uganda moves forward with its oil development.  The reality is that animal behavior is complex and it is important to approach it in that way.

The researchers confirmed that not all animals will respond to impacts in the same way, so it is impossible to generalize whether or not an activity is having an impact on animal behavior based on observations of one or two species.  They found that those animals with large home ranges (i.e. those that could move – like elephants and gorillas) did move (active avoidance), and those with more limited ranges (like duikers and monkeys) did not leave the areas where seismic testing was happening.  This is important to consider when measuring impacts of oil development

Looking Deeper into the Subtleties of Animal Behavior

Avoidance of habitat is easy to measure.  It is easy to say that before the blasting, elephants were found in the area and afterwards they weren’t.  Even four months after the seismic blasts were finished, the apes and elephants had still not returned to their normal patterns (although they acknowledged a lack of solid information about “normal” migration patterns for these species).

The flip side of this is the ability to look at the animals that don’t move and say there isn’t an impact from oil activities because those animals have not left the site.  Unfortunately, the researchers point out that if a species isn’t able to leave their home area, either due to biological characteristics or threat from others of their own species holding territories bordering of their own (as in the case of chimpanzees who sometimes kill intruders from a different clan), they might be subject to more stress even though it doesn’t result in moving out of the area.  In order to determine these more subtle impacts, they recommend looking at factors such as changes in breeding success and physiological stress indicators such as hormone changes.

Recommendations for Wildlife Monitoring in Uganda

Based on this article as well as other sources, here are a few important things for the monitoring bodies to be looking at in terms of the impacts of oil development on wildlife that might not be getting attention yet:

  • Besides looking at large movement patterns out of an area, look at daily patterns to see if animals are shifting their activities from daytime to nighttime to avoid the periods when people are most active in the drilling sites.
  • When/if drilling activities move into areas near forests with chimpanzees, monitor for increased conflicts or mortality that might be caused by individuals getting forced into a rival’s territory.
  • For animals that don’t leave the area as oil activity increases, check for increased stress hormones or a decrease in breeding success.
  • Look for changes in communication between elephant family members.  Much of their long-distance communication (sometimes over 10 kilometers) happens through the ground, so the vibrations from oil activities could interfere with elephants’ sub-sonic communication.

Uganda Needs More Data

As I mentioned at the beginning of this post, there is a serious lack of reliable data about the wildlife in the national parks here.  It is unfortunate that many of the observations of behavior patterns are just being conducted now, after oil exploration has already started.  There are many committed people who will do their best to gather baseline data, but frankly there just isn’t time to get solid data since it takes a number of years to account for annual changes in rainfall, cycles of breeding success, etc.

Perhaps the most important thing to keep in mind, though, is that even with the best data in the world, Environmental Impact Assessments, monitoring protocols and environmental regulations are only as strong as the will to enforce them.  Ultimately, none of it matters if the government cares more about the oil money than it does about protecting the environment the citizens depend on.

Mark D. Jordahl – Kampala

Solar Ovens To Launch Next Year in Uganda Through Diaspora Business

0

Next year, solar ovens will appear in the Ugandan market, and a new manufacturing plant will be launched in January, thanks to the entrepreneurship of Ugandan-American businessman Ronald Mutebi. After his company won $100,000 in the African Diaspora Marketplace, a competition sponsored by Western Union and USAID, Mutebi has piloted an assembly plant in Uganda to produce the ovens, which will be sold initially at $170 each. The parts come from Sun Ovens International, an American company based in Illinois.

The ovens are made with reflectors of anodized aluminum, which do not rust, a plastic outer shell, an aluminum inner shell, as well as fiberglass insulation. The ovens are produced in the U.S. but used around the world, including 100 developing countries. The ovens will benefit from the frequent sunshine in Uganda, and one oven can feed a family of eight. A solar oven, created by Sun Ovens. Mutebi’s passion and concern over deforestation in Uganda was a major factor in wanting to start a business that will produce and distribute the solar ovens. Ugandans who use the ovens will not need firewood or charcoal, both of which have caused the loss of tropical forests throughout Uganda.

“Uganda, as well as Africa as a whole, is losing its forest cover at an alarming rate, primarily due to fuel for cooking,” Mutebi told Ugandans Abroad. “This is what especially the population at the bottom of the pyramid rely on for their daily survival. Deforestation and its impact to global warming mean nothing, because to them it’s a matter of eating or not.” Mutebi became involved with the solar ovens when he learned about them at a Rotary International Conference in 2004. The inventor of the solar ovens, Tom Burns, is a longtime Rotary member, and Rotary runs solar oven projects on five continents. “Everyone who has seen the performance of the Sun Oven wants to get one,” Mutebi said.

The entrepreneur is from the Buganda region of Uganda, and is the nephew of the Kabaka, Ronald L. Muwenda Mutebi. He was raised just outside of Kampala, and attended Kasubi Family Primary and Mengo Senior Secondary. He went to Makerere University for undergraduate education, and followed his college degree with an additional degree in accounting in Kampala. He started his own custom metal fabrication business in 1997. He left Uganda to pursue further studies in the U.S. at Chicago’s Loyola University in 1999, and has a home in Chicago today. He is very involved with the Ugandan community in Chicago, and likes to play football with the Chicago Cranes, their diaspora team.

Since 1999, Mutebi’s perception of his culture and motherland has changed a great deal. “Before I travelled outside my culture to leave the country, you could not show me the wealth of my culture and heritage,” he said. “You know, the feeling of the grass being greener on the other side of the fence. But now, after living in the United States for over ten years, I am a big advocate for celebrating our culture in the diaspora.” Today, he runs the Tek Consults Group, a Chicago-based consulting group that helps professionals and companies do business in East Africa, and which won the $100,000 grant from the African Diaspora Marketplace to launch the solar ovens in Uganda. In addition to the Tek Consults Group, Mutebi also started the Ugandan American Global Initiatives, which coordinates and harmonizes humanitarian activities back home with American friends he has developed over the years in the U.S. At the end of the day, for Mutebi, being a Ugandan that lives in America is all about opportunities, challenges, and expectations.

“Opportunity is the fact that I live in the West, and can have many guarantees to the basic necessities of life,” he said. “Challenge in the fact that the many resources and opportunities cannot easily be transferred home. And expectation of the people left home that things just happen to you because you live in the West.” This festive season, demand for the solar ovens is keeping Mutebi busy—he’s traveled all over Uganda, working on the project. Once production is in place, he plans to split his time fifty-fifty between Uganda and the United States. He says that it feels great to be home, “but these days it is hard to tell where my home is.” Mutebi says that at least 1,000 individuals in Uganda have expressed interest in purchasing the ovens.

“Everyone who has seen the performance of the Sun Oven wants to get one,” Mutebi told Ugandans Abroad. “This is regardless of gender, class, or educational background.” Ronald Mutebi, near the White House in Washington, D.C. In November, Mutebi did a demonstration of the solar oven to Vice-President Gilbert Bukenya. “In a few minutes of seeing the oven cook and the temperatures that it was accumulating, he literally pulled out his wallet and paid in U.S. dollars for four ovens to be delivered to his country home,” Mutebi said.

“Overall, there has been a tremendously positive reception of the ovens not only in Uganda, but in all other countries where the ovens have been tested.” Ultimately, Western Union and USAID gave $1.4 million in grants to fourteen businesses, all run by Africans in the diaspora. 700 African immigrants applied, and 90 were selected as finalists. Judges looked for businesses that tapped into botht he knowledge of Africans in the diaspora and their local partners back home.

Many investors also attended, including representatives from the World Bank. USAID is encouraging its missions around the world to also offer technical expertise to winners in the competition. Mutebi hopes that other Ugandans living abroad will want to start, expand, and invest in businesses back home. “The message is simple. The time to build our continent is now!” he said. “Africa, even in the global depression, is still posting close to six points in growth, compared to the one to two percentage points the West is posting this year. Those who know this are running in droves to be part of the action.”

HOT NEWS

LATEST NEWS