Home Blog Page 183

UWA Releases Discounted Gorilla Permits

0
Gorilla Permit

The Uganda Wildlife Authority has announced promotional sale of gorilla permits covering May, October and November.

The promotional price is $ 350 for Foreign Non residents, $250 for foreign residents and sh. 100,000 for East Africans. The promotional price is applicable to unsold permits that are offered to be sold at this discounted rate but not all available permits in the month.
The permits may not be extended and cancelled, outside the guideless given above.

UWA plans to implement the promotional sales jointly with private sector operators especially hotel owners, tour operators and airlines. The private sector will provide complimentary rates for accommodation, meals and transport to complement the price reduction offered by UWA. Due to the huge demand for gorilla permits during the high season months, many tourists miss out on this activity due to the shortages of permits. It is expected that tourists who are unable to track the gorilla during the high seasons will consider doing so during this period at a discounted price. It is also an opportunity for Ugandans and long term visitors to Uganda to enjoy this unique opportunity of viewing the mountain gorillas and thereby create a better understanding of their conservation status and create more ambassadors for the species.

Bwindi National Park has a total of 28 gorilla families of which 6 are habituated for tourism, one is habituated for research and two more are in the process of habituation for tourism. Bwindi is home to over half of the worlds remaining mountain gorilla population.

Guidelines for sale of promotional gorilla permits

1. Background
Management of UWA has studied the pattern of Gorilla Permits sales overtime,and have noted with concern that ever many permits remain unsold during the months of March, April, May, October and November, every year, yet customers scramble for permits during the other months. To address this anomaly management plans to launch promotional sale of permits during the low season. Read more…

2. Promotional sales
Management will periodically announce and offer specific number of Gorilla permits for sale under this promotion during the months of March April, May, October and December of every year. The number of gorilla permits to be offered for sale will be determined by UWA management based on unsold balance from the two year advance booking policy and this will be announced to the public

3. Promotional rates
Gorilla permits sold at promotion rates, during the months mentioned will be charged as follows:

FNR $ 350
FR $ 250
EAC Shs. 100,000

4. Payment procedures
Payment for all gorilla permits sold under the promotional rates shall be done at the Reservations Office at UWA Headquarters in Kampala ONLY.
No promotional permits will be sold at the park
Permits offered for sale under this promotional arrangement will be paid for in full (100% of value) at the time of booking.
Payment Methods:
The acceptable payment methods are:

  • Cash (Uganda shillings, US dollars, UK pound sterling and Euros)
  • Bank Transfers (net of bank charges)
  • Bankers Cheques (net of bank charges)
    5. Commission to AUTO
    AUTO members will not earn commissions on permits offered for sale and purchased under this promotional arrangement.

6. Refunds I Cancellation
Cancellations of the permits under this arrangement will attract no refunds.

7. Primary, sale of permits by individuals or tour companies anywhere is illegal.
All permits MUST be sold by Uganda Wildlife Authority only.

8. All permits sold under this arrangement will contain the inscription
“PROMOTIONAL PERMIT” to avoid unscrupulous people from selling it out at
normal rates

9. UWA management reserves the right to announce or recall the promotional
sale of the Gorilla permits to the public without notice.

10. Payment for gorilla permits must be made directly to Uganda Wildlife
Authority.

11. RESCHEDULES OF PERMIT RESERVATIONS:

There will be no reschedules of permits offered under this promotion.

Lukwago-Musisi Row Threatens to Derail Development of Kampala

0

All is not well at City Hall, the seat of the Kampala Capital City Authority. Since the new body KCCA took over from Kampala City Council, many people have been expecting developments that will make Kampala a better city. Whether these developments are taking place or not is currently being overshadowed by the power struggles between the Executive Director of KCCA, Jennifer Musisi Ssemakula and the Lord Mayor of KCCA, Erias Lukwago.

Following the passing of the Kampala Capital City Authority Act 2010 by the 8th Parliament, there have been concerns on how the two powerful offices of the Lord Mayor and City Executive Director will work side by side. And it has not taken long before this conflict has manifested itself in the day-to-day running of the city.

The KCCA law was pushed by President Yoweri Museveni for the central government to take over the management of Kampala City which like other districts was being run like a local government unit (city council) headed by the Mayor. The government was concerned that the elected Kampala district council and Mayor was unable to properly manage the city, citing too much garbage, potholes, overflowing road and sewage channels, and market conflicts among other issues. The KCC leadership at the time was weary of the NRM government move, with many saying the government wanted to find another way to take over Kampala city after failing in elections where opposition candidates had been winning the Mayoral seat in the past three previous elections, as well as most Councilor positions in Kampala.

Although the original government proposal was to have an all powerful Executive Director appointed by the President presiding over administration of Kampala, with Mayor (Lord Mayor) elected among Kampala City as a ceremonial leader and chair of council meetings, the government gave in to pressure and allowed for the continued election of the Lord Mayor who is mentioned in the KCCA Act as the head of KCCA. Yet the law also says the Executive Director appointed by the President will be the Chief Executive Officer of KCCA and overall administrator and manager of all KCCA affairs. The Executive Director reports to the central government through the Minister for Kampala Affairs, and not the KCCA Council.

President Museveni duly appointed the Executive Director in mid April 2011 and Jennifer Musisi soon begun her duties. The Lord Mayor was also elected with opposition candidate Erias Lukwago the former MP for Kampala central achieving a comfortable victory in the March 2011 elections. But no sooner had the two officers taken office than misunderstandings over the running and management of KCCA issues started.

The fact that Musisi and Lukwago are strong headed individuals has not helped matters either as no room for compromise has been evident among the two KCCA top dogs. Musisi who came into her current job from the Uganda Revenue Authority where she was a Commissioner has a strong history of strict administration and unwavering authority. Lukwago is also a well known staunch advocate not only in the court rooms but in demanding for good public management of public issues, and he had hoped by becoming Mayor, he would not just demand but be in charge of directing the public management of Kampala City.

Lukwago, who insists that he is the head of KCCA first disagreed with Musisi over the Uganda Taxi Operators and Drivers Association contract, which he insisted had expired, while Musisi insisted UTODA had a contract with KCCA to continue collecting taxi transport revenues on behalf of KCCA. It was such an unfortunate scene to see the two officials clash publicly in a KCCA council meeting with Lukwago the Chair insisting he is not aware of any running contract with UTODA, while Musisi in the same meeting insisted that as the overall manager of KCCA, she is aware the UTODA contract was renewed and is valid. Lukwago asked Musisi to produce the new contract (which should have been offered by the council), but Musisi did not deliver it. Lukwago went ahead and asked drivers not to pay UTODA charges (he claimed they don’t remit the money), which partly resulted in the drivers’ strike that paralyzed transport in the city.

When the dust over UTODA was about to settle, the two leaders again conflicted on the issue of evicting vendors from Kampala streets. Musisi ordered the eviction of all street vendors, giving them a two week ultimatum to find alternative places to sell their goods. Traders owning shops in Kampala had been complaining about the vendors that they say sell same or similar items on streets, yet they do not pay taxes and licenses like the shops. Lukwago insisted the vendors should not be evicted before an alternative place is found for them. Musisi said her team had identified empty stalls in 86 different Kampala markets and vendors were free to go and occupy any of the stalls in markets. Lukwago urged the vendors not to leave but Musisi backed by police managed to prevail and the vendors were all evicted.

It soon came to the issue of the KCCA budget which Musisi together with the Minister in charge of Kampala, Kabakumba Masiko presented before Parliament. Lukwago says he was never consulted on the budget making and the priority areas, yet as elected Mayor, he has a manifesto which he must fulfill. To make matters worse, Lukwago says he learnt from the media that the Executive Director Musisi had proposed new salary structures for herself, the Lord Mayor and other senior staff of KCCA without consulting him. Musisi proposed that she should be paid 43.7 million shillings per month, Lukwago 33 million shillings with the 10 KCCA Directors taking more than 20 million shillings each. Lukwago who says he gets 13 million shillings as salary and facilitation for his duties complained that the move by Musisi was meant to demonized Lukwago as greedy for a big salary, yet he was not getting it or proposing it.

“In any case, why should the Executive Director who is like a Permanent Secretary earn more than me the head of KCCA? There is a deliberate attempt to marginalize me when I was elected by the people. They want to make me fail to deliver on the manifesto,” Lukwago says.

Lukwago also disagreed with Musisi over the awarding of a contract to city tycoon Hassan Basajabalaba to manage the City Abattoir on Port Bell Road which was under the management of the traders in the Abattoir. He has also been complaining about the awarding of several other contracts, and what he calls the failure of Musisi to investigate some shoddy procurement. He has been demanding Musisi to produce a report concerning the fraudulent sale of KCCA’s dispensary at plot 71 Nkrumah Road.

Then in a dramatic twist of events, Lukwago on Friday September 23rd filed a petition in the High Court asking for the interpretation of the KCCA Act as regards the powers of the Lord Mayor and Executive Director. “There is a deliberate attempt to present me, the elected Mayor, as a ceremonial head, which is not true according to the KCCA Act. The Lord Mayor has executive powers, but these powers have all been taken by the Executive Director,” Lukwago complains. Lukwago says Musisi has made it extremely difficult for him to execute his duties as Lord Mayor as well as developing strategies and programmes for the city.

He said the situation has got out of hand and only court can help resolve the power struggle between the Mayor and Executive Director to ensure the work of KCCA is not derailed. Lukwago said if the Court rules that the Lord Mayor has no executive powers and must submit to every decision of the Executive Director, he will resign the mayor position. “It will mean I hove no job here as mayor because I cannot deliver on the promises I made to people who elected me,” Lukwago said. He said Musisi is running everything at KCCA and has usurped the powers of the Lord Mayor and the Council.

But Musisi said she has not usurped anyone’s powers and is running the city according to the KCCA Act 2010. She says as Executive Director, she has powers to do whatever she has done, the reason all legal bodies like police have been backing her actions to ensure the city is a better place. Musisi says unlike Lykwago she is not a politician and implements what she has to do according to the law. She says the Lord Mayor should have read the law more deeply and understand it before contesting if he wanted to have executive powers, which she says are invested in the Executive Director and Minister of Kampala Affairs.

It might as well be true that Former Mayor Nassar Ntege Sebaggala was right and is having his day against his nemesis Lukwago. Sebaggala warned Lukwago that though he (Lukwago) won the position of Lord Mayor, he was going for “bwooya byanswa” (an empty position). “The real Mayor position ended with Sebaggala. Lukwago should read the new Act. He is just going to be a chairman of council which doesn’t implement anything in the city,” Sebaggala said earlier this year. Lukwago however disputes this position saying it is being wrongly propagated to hoodwink the public that the Lord Mayor has no powers in Kampala. He accuses Kabakumba of failing to meet political leaders of KCCA to help resolve the impasse with the Executive Director.

Kampala Central MP, Mohamed Nsereko says he is concerned about what he terms as Musisi’s disregard of elected leaders in Kampala. “The Executive Director needs to work in consultation with the elected leaders in Kampala, including the Mayor. They are the representatives of the people,” Nsereko says.

The Chairperson of the parliamentary Committee on Presidential Affairs and Statutory Bodies, Barnabas Tinkasimire says the conflicts between the Executive Director and Lord Mayor resulted from the hurried passing of the KCCA Act as the 8th parliament was winding up its business and MPs preparing for elections. Tinkasimiire’s Committee has summoned and met both Lukwago and Musisi but failed to resolve their power conflicts because the law is not conclusive on who is the boss of the other. Musisi according to the law should report to the Minister for Kampala and the President, while Lukwago is considered overall head of KCCA and thus reporting to the electorate.

“We might need to amend the law to ensure we properly provide for the coexistence of the Lord Mayor and the Executive Director with well defined duties and responsibilities and remove all incidences of overlapping powers between the two offices,” Tinkasimiire says.

CHOGM ‘Thieves’ To Face IGG Prosecution

0

The Inspector General of Government of Uganda, in short the IGG, has now confirmed that they will begin to prepare indictments towards some individuals suspected to have diverted funds or ‘stolen’ funds in the run up to the Commonwealth Summit in November 2007, following constant revelations from the parliamentary public accounts committee and interrogations of suspects by the CID officers attached to parliament. Many civil servants, business people and government officials were implicated by the public accounts committee and accused of complicity in the misuse of funds, while the public at large was outraged that road repairs and other infrastructural measures soon after the summit began to fall apart and deteriorate with no sign of maintenance or the initial contractors being asked to fix up their shoddy work.

In fact, sources from parliament are talking of their intention to press for prosecution of very senior officials, including the country’s Vice President, senior ministers including the state minister for tourism and a range of other officials who had come to the attention of the investigators and failed to absolve themselves while answering allegations and questions from MP’s. Notably the Vice President evaded the parliamentary committee; some sources suggest he defied summons; while others staged ‘walk outs’, took several summons to appear or failed to cooperate in the eyes of committee members.

The IGG will according to reports from parliament share the ‘burden’ of prosecution with the office of the Directorate of Public Prosecutions and court cases, according to another source close to the investigation, would likely be filed already soon.

The parliamentary public accounts committee also visited the president last week at State House in Entebbe to discuss issues surrounding their investigation and shed light on to attempts by some of those questioned before the committee trying to hide behind obscure ‘presidential directives’ without however presenting any documentary evidence to that effect. It was made clear by the President in the meeting, that while he was not in any way involved in procurement of goods and services for the summit, he had on several occasions guided and counselled those concerned to observe existing rules of procurement and ensure that the requirements of the Commonwealth Secretariat for holding such a summit, as laid down in the ‘Blue Book’ were catered for. He also challenged anybody trying to hide behind any of these obscure ‘directives’ to produce evidence to that effect. The President also expressed satisfaction, that inspite of the ongoing queries and investigations the summit overall was a success as it showcased Uganda around the Commonwealth family of nations and the world at large and subsequently increased tourism arrivals substantially. The President also commented favourably on the increase in bed capacity of the Ugandan hospitality industry, which he said was another reason why the country was now able to attract more conferences and global meetings, something not possible without having held the Commonwealth summit.

2010 being a pre-election year in Uganda, with general and presidential elections now less than a year away, this saga will obviously continue to attract public attention and it is not ruled out that consensus for some prosecutions will be granted sooner rather than later to present a strong anti corruption stand as repeatedly stated by the President to the Ugandan public at large and reiterated when meeting the parliamentary public accounts committee last week.

Was the Arrest of Vincent Nzaramba Illegal?

0

The recent arrest of Vincent Nzaramba over his book, People Power – Battle of the Mighty General, is not only a national embarrassment but it is also may violate several laws.  Freedom speech and freedom of the press are two cornerstones of a free and fair society and both are enshrined in the constitutional of The Republic of Uganda.  Article 29 of the Constitutional clearly states “Every person shall have the right to freedom of speech and expression which shall include freedom of the press and other media.”  Freedom of the media is an essential means by which the people protect themselves from tyranny.  Freedom of Conscious and expression are prized as the greatest happiness that man can posses in this world and it is the duty of the government to protect that right.

It is not only the constitution that the current government is throwing out the window but settled international law and treaties as well. Uganda is a signatory to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and Article 19 of the treaty states that “everyone shall have the right of freedom of expression.”  There are several other articles of the ICCPR that mention freedom the media or speech and the arrest of Mr. Nzaramba seems to be a direct violation of these principles.

There are, of course, some restrictions on the freedom of speech under international and domestic law that the government relies on to make these kinds of arrests. For example, one cannot shout “fire” in a crowded theater.  The AG, under obvious direction of the president has claimed that Mr. Nzaramba was trying to incite violence; which, if true, would certainly be an offense.  However, The United Nations Human Rights Committee has perhaps said it best when they wrote,

“…the mere fact that forms of expression are considered to be insulting to a public figure is not sufficient to justify the imposition of penalties. Moreover, all public figures, including those exercising the highest political authority such as heads of state and government, are legitimately subject to criticism and political opposition.”

So, clearly simply pointing out the illegal acts of a president does not fall into the exceptions of this freedom.  By making these kinds of arrests the government is hiding behind a false shield.  They are showing that they believe the people of Uganda are too stupid to know their rights. Furthermore, The “President” is showing his true colors by this petty retaliatory act against a critic. There is far greater danger to the country by suppressing critical speech than by letting such criticism stand. This arrest is not only illegal but it is a national embarrassment, an insult to Ugandans, and an insult to free people everywhere.

Will Museveni Survive Mabira or Will Mabira Survive Museveni

0

Whether you look at it as a political or economic issue, President Yoweri Museveni’s insistence on giving away part of Mabira forest to the Sugar Corporation of Uganda (SCOUL) to boost sugar production is a decision that continues to surprise and irk his enemies and allies alike.

Despite strong opposition to his proposal from Uganda’s opposition and even many members of his ruling National Resistance Movement government, Museveni has insisted that the forest (which he says is degraded) should be given to SCOUL. While the President continues to insist that he needs scientific evidence that giving away part of Mabira forest will result in dire environmental consequences before he changes his mind, there is a lot of talk that Museveni’s strong stand in wanting to give away Mabira is not connected to sugar production.

It is not the first time Museveni has tried to give away that very part of Mabira, considered to be one of the most environmentally valuable forests in Uganda and Africa in general. He tried in 2007 with disastrous consequences where the anti Mabira give away demonstrations in Kampala alone resulted in the death of more than two people and destruction of property. As Museveni should know better than anyone else, the mood in the country right now, is even more against the give away of the forest.

Why Museveni’s stand on Mabira is so surprising?There are many people discontented about the economic hard times that the country is going through that striking over Mabira is almost a given if a decision is passed to this effect. There have already been protests by opposition activities, teachers, drivers and taxi operators, traders, lecturers and students of Makerere; while many more groups are threatening to go on strike. Museveni is aware of the delicate volatile situation but the man will not change his stand on Mabira give away.

Museveni has on several occasions rejected offers for alternative land to increase sugar cane production, leaving many wondering what it is the president wants with Mabira. The leaders in newly created Bungokho district in July offered to provide land to SCOUL to grow sugarcane there and establish a factory, but Museveni rejected the offer, saying if the land is available, it will be given to another investor. Museveni continuously reasons with Mehta that the investor needs to get land within 30kms of his current factory.

Why Mehta’s SCOUL?

Yet many people have long been concerned on why this focus on Mehta and his SCOUL. Neither the only or biggest sugar producer, SCOUL’s placement at the center of solving Uganda’s sugar shortage is not making sense to many Ugandans, with some alluding to some factors being behind the decision that are more than meet the eye. The Madvhani owned Kakira Sugar Works produces over 50% of Uganda’s sugar, while Kinyara Sugar Works and SCOUL each produce an average of 25% of the sugar in Uganda. All companies heavily export sugar and there is concern on whether sugar shortage is a result of limited production capacity or unlimited possibility by sugar producers to export sugar to better paying neighbors especially South Sudan.

The biggest surprise however was the way Museveni backed up his position saying “Mehta has said he (Mehta) does not mind what the public thinks against giving him the forest”. This made many people wonder whether Museveni, the strong almost single handed supreme leader of the NRM that has dominated Uganda’s politics since his military take-over in 1986 is taking orders from Mehta. Many people have been asking themselves why Museveni should mind more about what Mehta thinks and not what the majority of Ugandans think. Mehta also continues to insist that only part of Mabira will allow him to increase sugar production (never mind the company not offering any production capacity guarantees).

It seems this kind of situation is behind the talk doing rounds in Kampala that Museveni and his NRM owes something to Mehta that makes the businessman be able to put the President under pressure to do what he (Mehta) wants, not withstanding the negative repercussions as in this case. In fact, one man claiming to be a security operative told UGPulse that it is suspected Museveni promised to give Mehta part of Mabira forest for the support Mehta has provided to Museveni and NRM since the start of the guerilla way back in 1981.

“The businessman has been patient, waiting for the promised land to be given to him and it has reached that time when the president feels he should deliver on that promise,” the man said, refusing to divulge his names. Efforts to get a comment from Mehta Group about this were futile as calls were not returned as promised.

Unconvincing and lonely Museveni

While Museveni has insisted his interest in this matter is to ensure more sugar production, and ultimately serve the needs of Uganda, the man who recently won the elections with more than 68% of the votes cast (according to official results declared by the Electoral Commission) has not managed to convince many people (if any at all) that it is necessary to give away part of Mabira forest.

When Museveni called the NRM Parliamentary Caucus over the matter, most of the MPs vehemently opposed the president on giving away the forest, urging their leader to consider other alternatives.

“I will not support its giveaway because there is alternative land being offered on leasehold by the Church of Uganda and the Buganda Land Board,” said Ezra Kwizera (NRM), the deputy chairperson of the Natural Resources Committee.

Other MPs led by Kampala Central MP, Muhammed Nsereko (NRM), Theodore Sekikubo (NRM Rwemiyaga), Dr. Chris Baromunsi (NRM Kinkizi West) and a host of other legislatures said the President has been misguided and is bent on something clearly opposed by the majority of Ugandans. The Mps have threatened to organize rallies and protests against the give away of Mabira.

Even key allies like Museveni’s Senior Presidential Advisor on Media and Public Relations, John Nagenda have publicly criticized the president for insisting on giving away the forest, with Nagenda even accusing the president of not listening to sound advise, and increasingly becoming autocratic.

Some people are also concerned that the statements coming out of the president’s mouth defending his position. They have been unconvincing as they have been disappointing.

“I do not need any lessons on forests. I saved Mabira when we took power. Idi Amin had given it to the people. Unlike some of those who engage in arrogance over Mabira, I do not drink alcohol or go to bars. I always think about developing Uganda for the well-being of Ugandans,” the President said recently while meeting teachers, where he accused those against the give away of Mabira of being arrogant.

In another incident, Museveni blamed the current sugar scarcity resulting in high sugar prices on the opposition, singling out Beatrice Anywar, the shadow Cabinet minister for energy for leading a successful protest against Mabira give away in 2007.

Anywar who heads the Save Mabira Crusade had led a group of people opposed to the Mabira give away to meet the president over the matter, although the two sides failed to change each other’s views on the matter.

“If the government had given alternative land in 2007, the sugarcane would be under harvest now. The president should stop the blame game and diverting people’s attention from the current economic crisis, rising unemployment and poverty,” Anywar said recently.

Is the Mabira saga a political game by Museveni?

In fact, there are some people praising the President for being an astute politician who is always thinking way ahead of the rest and landing political maneuvers when and wherever it matters most. Those of this view say that Museveni knows that there are many people concerned about high sugar prices and he has to come out with a big reason why the government will not be able to solve the sugar scarcity problem. “Museveni is not interested in giving away Mabira. He knows what people think and feel about this forest, but he wants to have an excuse in the future if there is insufficient supply of sugar,” says one Deo Kimami, a trader.

But others believe the president’s rigid and rugged support to the Mabira give away was a well calculated political move to divert the attention of Ugandans from the effects of the economic hard times that had started causing strike after strike and protest after protest. “This is one of Museveni’s master strokes. He has succeeded in making many people concentrate on Mabira and forget the economic issues biting the common man,” says an NRM supporter who asked not to be named.

There are also those saying the President will finally give in to anti Mabira sentiments, and finally show all and sundry what a listening and responsive leader he is. In fact, other than the recent gesture of inviting the Save Mabira Crusade leaders to his country home to explain to him “their reasons for opposing his proposal of giving away the forest”, Museveni recently said the forest will only be given away if the Parliament agrees (and not by his decree only).  Although Museveni who has an overbearing hand on this majority NRM legislature, many NRM MPs have already opposed the move and it is expected he will please those in the NRM who are opposed to the Mabira give away, in addition to scoring against the opposition as being a listening president. Some people are also mentioning the fact that there has never been a cabinet meeting and resolution on this matter, and the fact that only Museveni and no other minister is marketing this proposal is reason enough to be a Museveni-only political master card.

How about the other land being given away?

But this might be reading too much into a situation, given that Museveni has also proposed to give away land to other sugar producers in Masindi (to Kinyara Sugar Works) and in Amuru (to Kakira Sugar Works). Museveni recently invited district leaders and agricultural officers across the country for a meeting at State House where he gave a three-month ultimatum to the relevant government ministries to give Isinmab prison land in Masindi to Kinyara Sugar Works.

The King of Bunyoro Kitara Kingdom Omukama Solomon Gafabusa Iguru and leaders in the area were also quick to oppose this government proposal, arguing that the prison land (which Iguru claims was grabbed by the government from the kingdom) should instead be given out to sugarcane out-growers to increase their production and supply of cane for sugar production. The kingdom also urged the government to compel sugar factories to give fair conditions and payment to out-growers to encourage them to grow and supply more sugarcane. The shortage of sugar was partially attributed to a strike by workers and out-growers in Masindi based Kinyara Sugar works where some sugar plantation were burned down after unmet demands for better pay.

Museveni is also pushing for Madhvani owned Kakira Sugar Works to be given land in Amuru district to construct a sugar factory and establish sugarcane plantations there. The local people have been up in arms against the proposal, although in this case Kakira Sugar Works is expected to pay compensation to the affected residents.

So surely, this land giving for improved sugar production is beyond the Mabira give away debate. Or is it? So for many people, a question still lingers on why President Museveni is insisting on giving away part of Mabria forest. For now, most Ugandans are increasingly debating (with concern) whether Mabira forest will survive Museveni-the-man who vehemently and relentlessly wants to give part of the forest away, or if Museveni goes ahead and gives out Mabira, he will survive the give away of arguably Ugandans’ dearest forest.

The Rise of Lwakataka

0

When it comes to bragging in Uganda, Rally driver Ponsiano Lwakataka only shares the super rights with Kick boxer, Moses Golola.  But in Lwakataka’s case, many more people say that he deserves to brag considering where he has come from visa vis the star cult status he has established in the sport of motor rallying in Uganda.

The rise of Lwakataka

In the sport of motor rallying, it’s a rare occurrence in the last two decades that a driver is compared to the skills of the former Dembe Rally team driver, Karim Hirji or corner specialist Chipper Adams. When the duo’s reign came to an end, there arose the era of the likes of Charles Muhangi, Charlie Lubega, Moses Lumala and Emma Katto before the arrival of the late Riyaz Kurji  on the scene.

But as the “hey” days of the above quartet seem to be over, one can hear ringing bells alerting the ever vocal 38 year old Ponsiano Lwakataka to take over the mantle.

Rwakataka has gone an extra mile of establishing an empire of motor rallying in his family.  His wife Rose Rwakataka is among the most popular female rally drivers in the country only next to Suzan ‘Iron Lady’ Muwonge. As if this is not enough, he has embarked on grooming his children too, in this sport.

From fishmonger to motor rallying

Lwakataka, formerly a fish monger along Lake Victoria, joined motor rallying a decade ago plying his trade in a lesser Toyota Lavin that could only render him a participant in events other than a competitor.

In 2004, he climbed the ladders when he acquired Subaru Impreza N4 which his fans nicknamed ‘Yellow bird.’   Despite the acquisition of that machine, things never worked out till 2005 when he claimed the National Rally Championship (NRC) title after beating the likes of big boys Ronald Ssebuguzi and the Riyaz Kurji (RIP).

That triumph was his turning point. Since then Lwakataka never stepped back the pedal as evidenced by his performance in 2007 when he won his second National Rally Championship  title.

After a one year holiday, he returned in 2009 in style, armed with a powerful Subaru Impreza N8 machine that hasn’t only tormented local drivers but also left a mark at the international stage.

Pearlof Africa Rally Champion

Lwakataka’s rallying career reached its apex in June this year (2011) when he lifted one of Africa’s most prestigious championship, the Pearl of Africa Uganda Rally that had eluded him for a long time despite giving his all in the competition over the years. This was to a surprise of most of the Ugandan motor rallying fraternity basing on the international big names he tussled it out with. This included African reigning champion Jimmy Whyte from Zimbabwe, Burundi’s Allan Bethise, Christak Fitidis of Rwanda and the Madagascan pair of Fredrick Rokotomanga and Ronarievo Jean.

His victory meant that he joins the elite class of greats, Charles Muhangi, Charlie Lubega, and Chipper Adams as the only Ugandans to have won that championship.

The 38 year old was overjoyed after the victory.  “I had suffered painful exits for long. This is just a beginning and the best is yet to come, because my target is to once rule the African Continent,” said Lwakataka shortly after arriving at the finishing Podium.

Ending a painful wait

He was referring to his painful exits in the 2005, 2006 and 2010 editions in which he narrowly missed winning the championship. In 2005, just like in 2006, Lwakataka was relegated to the second position behind the late Riyaz Kurj and in 2010 he was only denied by mechanical problems of his car, dropping in the final section while commanding a comfortable lead.

He has just punctuated his so-far-so-good season with a victory in the Eastern Motor Rally championship, the second last on the National Rally Calendar. Lwakataka’s  win wasn’t only a big blow to Suzan’ iron lady’ Muwonge’s  quest of becoming the first lady to scoop the Ugandan National Rally Championship title but also meant that the title might go on wire. This is after Lwakataka cut Muwonge’s lead to only 25 points.

Tough road to success

As the a common aphorism goes that no gain without pain, Lwakataka’s  path to success hasn’t been a bed of roses throughout his eleven year old motor rallying career as he is often endured through a forest of controversies especially with the Ugandan Motor Rally governing body, FMU.

Among his notable hiccups, two years ago Rwakataka was banned from the sport as a result of fielding his under-aged sons in a sprint he had organized in Mukono. This is contrary to the rules of the sport.

This occurred shortly before the 2005 saga in the Pearl of Africa Rally in which he was accused of tampering with his engine after posting an ‘abnormal’ time in the Circuit. Lwakataka though refutes the allegation. “It wasn’t true. I just decided to heavy my foot on the pedal,” he brags.

Controversies surrounding Lwakataka seem to be endless; in the previous two seasons, top drivers, including Ssebuguzi, declined to take part in any rally in which the later was involved in organization. This was in protest that Lwakataka manipulates events.

Whatever the case, Lwakataka amidst his brag-ish nature, remains the current leading rally driver in the Uganda whose only undoing emanates from the unquestionable competition from his adversaries.

Hoping for more glory

After failing to score even a single point from Tanzania Rally held this month – September 2011, the 2006 National Champion Posiano Lwakataka is still confident that he will make it at the final Independence Rally October 14-16 in Mukono and Buikwe districts. Lwakataka hopes to  reclaim the title from reigning National Champion, Nasser Mutebi. He will have to fight the Iron Lady who leads the pack with 365 points and currently puts him in second place with 340 points.

“I know I can comfortably win the NRC title without even participating in the Tanzanian Rally. In fact I had changed my mind not to make it to Tanzania but my fans have advised me not to take any more chances for granted. You know in motor rallying the driver commands only 20% to his or her success and the rest belongs to the almighty God,” Lwakataka had said before the past Tanzania Rally, on his chances of lifting the championship.

Finally Tinyefuza Vacates KCCA House

0

The coordinator of intelligence services, Gen. David Tinyefuza today morning (Wednesday) vacated the house belonging to the Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA), ending a row over its occupation.

The house located on Plot 2, Mabua Road in Kololo, an upscale Kampala suburb, served as a national intelligence coordinator centre headed by Gen.Tinyefuza.

By 9:00am, all the property in the posh house had been removed. The last items which included chairs, tables and other household items were ferried on two small pick-ups at 8:30am.

Speaking shortly after handing over the house to KCCA, security minister, Muruli Mukasa lauded the Authority for allowing the army to use the house.

He appealed to KCCA to maintain a cordial relationship with the army, saying both were serving the good of the country.

The keys of the house have been given to the Deputy Director of physical planning Goerge Agaba by the security minister Mukasa Muluuli.

The hand over marks the end of a standoff between KCCA and General Tinyefuza, who had earlier threatened to arrest any one who attempted to evict him.

The recovery of the house is part of a campaign by KCCA to recover its properties, which were illegally sold off or given away by the previous leadership.

Agaba says there are more KCCA properties that are still in the wrong hands, which the authority is vowing to pursue.

Gen. Tinyefuza was not at the scene but the house was empty and clean.

Musevenism: When the President Has to Handle Every Issue

0

The dire economic times in Uganda have once again brought up the issue of whether Uganda’s government institutions are functioning the way they should be. As different groups of people rise up to express their concerns and discomfort, there is an increasing trend of every group only settling after meeting the President. It is like no other government office or official in Uganda can ever do anything trustable other than the big man himself.

The opposition has for long been criticizing the NRM government, led by President Yoweri Museveni, of failing to foster the growth of government institutions. But what has not been clear until recently is how bad the situation is when an every issue seems only solvable by the President.

When a group of traders under their umbrella group Kampala City Traders Association (KACITA) recently went on strike over the decreasing value of the Uganda shilling over the dollar, URA charging taxes in dollars and high license fees, their strike was only stopped after they met and “got assurance from President Museveni that their issues would be handled”.

The Minister of Trade and Industry Amelia Kyambadde had held two meetings with the traders but they refused to halt on their demands until “they meet the President”.

Minister Kyambadde had made many promises including suspending trading license fees (which she later retracted) and the Bank of Uganda intervening in the forex market to save the Uganda shilling as well a possible talk to URA over requiring taxes on imported goods in US dollars. The traders only calmed down and called off the strike after meeting president Museveni immediately after his return from a four day state visit in South Africa.

Just a few days later, a group of taxi drivers in Kampala unhappy about the way the Uganda Taxi Drivers and Operators Association was conducting city transport declared a sit down strike. The country was shocked when the chairman of the group- Drivers and Conductors association (DACCA) Mustafa Mayambala said the President had called him and promised to meet the drivers to look into their concerns.

The same drivers group had attended a joint meeting between them and UTODA concerned by the Vice President Edward Kiwanukan Ssekandi. The complaining traders refused to call off the strike despite an order by Ssekandi for UTODA to halt collection of some fees (which even UTODA did not honour). The drivers resumed work the next day only after meeting the President at Statehouse Entebbe in which he assured them that their concerns will be handled.

Not long after this incident, teachers under their Uganda National Teachers Union went on strike asking for 100% salaries increase from the current average of 200,000 shillings that a teacher in primary schools earn. The teachers have long demanded a pay rise saying the money they are paid is too little to even look after one person. The situation was exacerbated by the rising price of essential goods and services both for schools and in their personal homes.

Despite several meeting with MPs, Ministry of Education and Ministry of Finance officials, the teachers continued with their strike until the President, who had earlier said their demands cannot be met, agreed to meet them. Museveni met the teachers’ leaders at State House and set up an inter-ministerial committee to look into their demands and meet them within a month.

These are just some of the recent incidents which depict the worrying situation where government offices and officials up to the Vice President are treated with contempt or side stepped by those with any demand until they meet with the President and his view or directive on the matter.

There have been long held concerns over the President and Statehouse directing activities in many government offices, included purchases of key equipment, solving land conflicts, employment of key staff as well as allocation of scarce resources.

There are concerns that such a situation has reduced public confidence in government institutions solving people’s day to day problems and meeting the service delivery needs of the public.

But how did this come about, and what are the implications of such an attitude towards government institutions and the general governance of Uganda?

Wafula Ogutu, the Spokesperson of the leading opposition political party Forum for Democratic Change says Museveni’s leadership has from the beginning concentrated on promoting him as a person and neglected building public institutions that should adequately handle routine government business.

“That is exactly what Museveni wants. To be the alpha and omega of everything in Uganda. Every government activity rotates around him. He has managed to make Ugandans to believe that it is only him that matters and is the solution to every problem,” he said in an interview.

It is not only the opposition leaders that are concerned. One of the NRM leaders recently criticized Museveni for over concentration of powers in the Presidency, leaving his ministers and other government officials with almost no power to handle issues concerning the nation.

The youth national coordinator of NRM, Sewava Serubiri termed the trend as ‘Musevenism’. He says that the act by the president to meet every group of people who have grievances with the way the government is handling issues undermines powers of ministers and other government officials.

“All these groups are playing with the president. But it could also be because he is a more accessible leader. It is hard for the local masses to access ministers than the President because of the long process in seeking an appointment with the ministers,” Serubiri says.

Prof. Aaron Mukwaya, a political science lecturer at Makerere University says while in being easily accessible the President manages to respond to people’s needs and demands, this should be done in a way that does not compromise state institutions and undermine public offices.

“If the President is being consulted as the highest authority on any matter, that is ok. But if he has to respond to everything that comes up, what will other public officials running government institutions do? The government structure and hierarchy needs to be respected. We also need to know whether the President is acting alone or with the responsible public officials on a given matter in arriving at a decision,” Prof. Mukwaya says.

Some people are also concerned that public officials manning government institutions might fear to do their work because the president might have his own take at things should anyone complain. Not so long ago, it was reported that Bank of Uganda Governor Prof. Emanuel Tumusiime Mutebile had expressed concern at the way the government was spending when the President ordered for the purchase of two fighter jets at 1.7 trillion shillings from the government treasury, which money was not budgeted for.

Mutebile later came out to say he did not question the President’s decision or directive, and has since said little at the current economic crisis where inflation is at 18%, the Uganda shilling is strongly weakened against major foreign currencies, and prices of essential commodities like food, sugar, soap and fuel are rising by the day beyond the affordability of most Ugandans.

Museveni has always insisted there is no problem in Uganda, attributing the price fluctuations to imported inflation, over dependence on imports and drought. A cabinet meeting has been called on Thursday August 5th to discuss the dire economic situation but it is not clear whether any minister or government technocrat will push views centrally to what the President thinks.

While the principle of collective responsibility binds all ministers and government officials to follow the government’s official line, and no one can practically expect a minister of subordinate to contradict their boss, more Ugandans are getting concerned that little will be done on any issue (however small) until the President or State House is involved.

Ugandan Couple Weds In Baltimore

0

The Ugandan community gathered in Baltimore to celebrate the marriage of Dubar Kamara and Apolo Ndyabahika today.

Ndyabahika’s family hails from Kabale in Uganda, and Kamara is from both Kabale and Mufore in Sierra Leone. The ceremony incorporated both cultures. A cultural group also performed Kiganda dance.

Winnie Byanyima and Dr. Kizza Besigye came as honorable dignitaries to the event.

Kamara was the first in her village to graduate from college. She went to John Hopkins University. Ndyabahika studied at Messiah College.

The couple plans to settle in the Washington metropolitan area.

Bududa Mudslide: Affected Residents Appeal for Resettlement

0
Bududa landslides

Following the mudslides that occurred in Shamwiyi village in Bulucheke Sub County in Bududa district that seriously injured six people last week, residents there have appealed to government to find an alternative land to relocate them for safety of being swept away given the eminent sign of a possible landslide in the area.

The appeal was made by the area local Council II chairperson of SakuSaku parish Mr. John Mushalaka August 11 saying about 300 households from four affected villages of Shamwiyi, Wanzeketse, Shinyenye and Shiwowo are at a risk of being swept by mudslide and that residents are in dare need of relocation.
He added that although these residents are willing to relocate, they do not have an alternative land to relocate to given the fact that where they live and cultivate from is their only ancestral land they posses thus the need for government intervention to save their plight.

“All of us here are willing to relocate to a safer land if government can provide it for us. At the moment we do not have anywhere to relocate to yet we are living in fear everyday there is torrential rainfall because there are eminent signs of possible reoccurrence of mudslides which puts us at risk of death,” said Mr. Mushalaka.

According to the district’s production officer Mr. Simon Wadada, the topography of the area stands at an altitude of over 80 degrees centigrade which is too steep for human habitation and cultivation saying the 300 households estimated to accommodate about 21, 000 people are all at a high risk of a possible mudslide if the torrential rains persisted now and in the future.

He explained that the rise in population around the slopes of Mt. Elgon led to encroachment on forest reserve land for cultivation which involved clearing of soil reservation vegetation thus weakening the soils saying it’s this situation that poses a danger to any human life living there.

“Any topography above 60 degrees centigrade is considered inhabitable therefore living at an altitude of over 80 degrees like for the parish of SakuSaku puts the residents there at a risk therefore government should respond to their call and relocate them,” said Mr. Wadada.
The chief administrative officer Mr. Vitalis Oswan told Daily Monitor that his office has contacted the ministry of relief and disaster preparedness in response to the residents call and that they are yet to receive a feed back on the same.

He said, “We have tabled the residents’ concerns to the office of the prime minister and we believe the ministry of relief and disaster preparedness is going to respond soon. We are also working hand in hand with Red Cross to see how to assist the victims,” Mr. Oswan said.
When contacted on phone, the state minister for relief and disaster preparedness Mr. Musa Ecweru said his office is trying to ascertain the number of those living in very risky areas so government can budget for their relocation.

Mr. Ecweru explained that he has instructed local leaders to meanwhile persuade them to live the risky areas and seek alternative residence with their relatives living on habitable land as government formalizes plans to find land for their relocation.

“Obviously we must relocate them but it is not going to take immediate effect. The local leaders have already been dispatched to this area to find immediate solutions like persuading the affected people to live the risky land and seek refugee with their relatives as government finds alternative land for their relocation,” Mr. Ecweru said.

HOT NEWS

LATEST NEWS